And also, I have asked who is the real owner of my spreadshop multiple times now and also what the construction of this is in simple words like ownership and which title would be relevant to whom (owner, company, partner, spreadshop, your shop, spreadshirt, or powered by), and somehow I never get an answer to this particular part which absolutely matters in a very important significant way for many other concerns. The way I see it: Spreadshirt has provided a subbranch of the company called Spreadshop. On this shop, a random person can be an owner of a shop. But they don’t own the shop now do they. They own the spreadshop, from spreadshop. Like an acount within the company. And, we dont own spreadshop, spreadshop does (or powered by spreadshirt or something). We get payed, so are we laborers? partners? ownership? a company? Ehm? What does this mean in juristic terms? I would like to understand this for the sake of clarity, copyright and tax related critical information that should be clear from the start. And yes I have read all of your information pages endlessly. No they do not clarify this, or I have missed one of them.
“you are responsible for the content of the shop”. Is that a nice way to cover up the fact that I am not an owner, and that you can put all the blame on me as a misinformed ‘shopowner’ when I buy a RF license for commercial use and you illegally print the image while not having permission by the license, while telling me I can use the license legally, and then telling me its my fault if you break the law of ‘Copyright’ because you print the image without a license? I am sorry but I am getting very annoyed after trying to get some simple answers and I don’t feel like this is going to be any fun anymore. And by the way, I do not believe this argument would cover this in any court. Not that I was planning on going to any court that is why I just would like a simple answer for my simple question. Which apparently the seller of my image gave me, saying that I can use it, but then Spreadshirt would be breaking copyright law because the company uses the image without a license. That sounds like logic to me. But nobody from Spreadshirt/spreadshop will reply to this in a similar logical way that makes sense, I only get responses that seem to be primarily focussed on legally covering spreadshirts behind. Not an answer that tells me what is on the info page. Not an answer at all actually.
You say this holds true. Personal shop. Is that my spreadshop, or was this ment to apply to shops not related to spreadshop that are personal and not on the platform from spreadshirt, because then it would be true yes. But it’s not my question. My question is if I can use it on the spreadshop I ‘own’. Because, that is what is on the information page.
And as a company you can not take your hands of your own responsibility to not break the laws for copyright. I don’t know how this works in the USA, bet not very different, but it seems to me like everyone should hold up to the copyright laws, including spreadshirt. And if you use an image, just like anyone else and any other company, without any copyright license then you can not blame the source of the image because they “gave you access” and you use an image without a license. Because then I could sue, blame or make google the responsible party at fault for giving me access to an image when I break a law and put on my spreadshop that I am not responsible but the source who gave me access is. ?
